SPECIAL FEATURES @ THE GL@ZINE

 

Controlling Solar Overheating in Buildings

Designers must now comply with regulations to limit solar overheating in buildings, as Paul Littlefair of BRE explains.

A requirement to limit exposure to solar overheating in buildings, other than homes, was included in the Building Regulations for the first time in April 2002. It covers new non-domestic buildings, extensions and some changes to existing buildings such as facade replacement.

The requirement applies to naturally ventilated spaces as well as those that have mechanical ventilation or cooling. The idea behind this is to avoid the retrofitting of cooling systems in naturally ventilated buildings that overheat.

It only applies to occupied spaces. Some buildings have stacks or atria to drive air movement, which are not covered unless they are occupied. As a rough guide, spaces that are only occupied on a temporary basis, such as circulation spaces, do not count as occupied. But if an atrium, for example, contains a reception area or restaurant where people work for a substantial part of the day, then that would count as an occupied space and would need to comply with the requirement.

Guidance on complying with the Building Regulations is given in Approved Document (AD) L21. It suggests three design strategies for avoiding solar overheating - appropriate glazing design, using solar shading or using exposed thermal mass with night ventilation - and gives three specific ways to comply with the requirement in a space. These are:

* limiting glazing area
* limiting solar load with a simple calculation method
* using a more detailed method to show the space will not overheat.

They are alternatives, so only one of them need be used to demonstrate compliance for a particular space.

Limiting glazing area
One way to comply is to show that each occupied space has a glazing area no more than a specific percentage of the internal area of the window wall. This applies to spaces with glazing in one side only. The limiting percentage depends on orientation. For a north facing wall 50% glazing could be allowed, while on an east, south east, south west or west facing wall the limit would be 32%. For a south, north east or north west facing wall the percentage is 40%. A space with rooflights and no side windows would comply if the rooflight area were less than 12% of the ceiling area.

In most cases these are quite large areas, sometimes greater than the base areas given in the guidance for avoiding excessive heat loss. But this guidance applies to individual spaces, rather than the building as a whole. So they could affect the freedom of the designer to trade off window area from other parts of the building to produce highly glazed, potentially overheating spaces.

For horizontal rooflights, the area of glazing to limit overheating is less than the overall rooflight area given in the guidance to reduce heat loss. This is because of the high summer solar gains through these rooflights. Here 'horizontal' actually includes shed type rooflights inclined at up to 30°.

If higher glazing areas are required, compliance needs to be shown in some other way. For example if shading devices or solar control glazing are included, the Limiting solar load method described below could be used to allow for their effect. For buoyancy ventilation using the height of the rooflit space, a more complex overheating calculation, perhaps involving CFD modelling, may be necessary. For vertical or near vertical sawtooth rooflights, the Limiting solar load method will normally allow higher glazing areas even without shading devices.

Where glazing areas are above the limiting values, or there are windows in more than one wall, or a combination of windows and rooflights, one of the other methods should be used to demonstrate compliance.

Limiting solar load
The second way to comply is to show that the average solar load on peak summer days would not be greater than 25W per m2 of floor area in each space. For rooms with standard low emissivity double glazing, lit from one side only, this gives equivalent results to the Limiting glazing area method described above. But this method is more flexible. It can be applied to rooms with windows in more than one side, or with a combination of windows and rooflights. And it can allow for the benefits of installing special solar shading devices.

The method sounds complicated, but is actually fairly straightforward. Appendix H in AD L2 explains how to do the calculation. It involves:
1. taking a solar load factor from table H1 of the AD for each orientation of windows or rooflights in the space
2. multiplying this by the area of glazing facing that orientation, and by another factor that depends on the type of shading installed
3. adding together the solar loads from (2) if there is more than one window wall or a combination of windows and rooflights
4. dividing by the floor area of the space - areas more than 6 metres from the window wall do not count unless they have rooflights
5. checking that the final answer is less than 25W/m2.
There is scope here for large glazing areas in some spaces, provided suitable shading is specified. Appendix H of the AD gives a table of factors (taken from CIBSE Guide A3) for generic types of shading and glazing combinations. An alternative is to use the manufacturer's shading coefficient data. The shading coefficient is the ratio of the heat gain transmitted by the glazing/shading combination compared with that for single clear glazing. Equations H3, H4 and H5 in the AD Appendix show how to use the shading coefficient data in this way.
Equation H4 gives the correction factor for moveable shading. This equation (also based on CIBSE Guide A3) assumes that moveable shading (for example internal blinds) would be in place only half the time, a reasonable assumption for manual control. Building occupants prefer manually controlled shading in spaces like offices.

AD L2 does not contain data for brise soleils, horizontal louvres and overhangs. But a way of proceeding is to follow the ASHRAE Fundamentals Guide which provides formulae to calculate the percentage of the window that will be shaded at each hour of the day.

This information can then be combined with the hourly data for July (from CIBSE Guide A3, tables A5.18-A5.23) to predict the solar cooling load, taking the value from the relevant orientation for the unshaded part of the window and the north facing value for the shaded part. And in both cases taking additional credits for any extra solar protection from blinds or special glass. These data can then be used to calculate the average solar load over the period 07:30 to 17:30, and to compare it with the target of 25W/m2.

As an alternative, most computer programs used for design calculations have the facility for modelling the effects of external shading, including overhangs and fins. Such a program could therefore be used to demonstrate that the limiting solar load has not exceeded the 25W/m2 target value.Demonstrating the space will not overheat.

Finally, compliance is possible by using detailed calculation procedures to show that the space will not overheat or require cooling when subjected to an internal gain of 10W/m2. This is intended to provide a completely flexible method of demonstrating compliance.

It could be used, for example, in spaces with night cooling and thermal mass, or where innovative natural ventilation techniques (eg stack effects in tall spaces) are used. An exact definition of what constitutes overheating is not given in the AD, because different spaces will have different requirements and different calculation tools use slightly different criteria. The AD quotes chapter 5 of CIBSE Guide A3 as a source of suitable calculation procedures, but any reputable calculation technique could be used.

The Nitecool program is an easy-to-use tool for calculating peak and average temperatures inside spaces with side windows, and can be used to explore natural ventilation options. For more complex interiors, or the use of thermal mass, a more dynamic energy simulation program can be used. Where stack effects or air flows are important, CFD modelling can be used to simulate the way warm air rises and is dispersed through high level vents.

When using technical references and guidance not mentioned in the Approved Documents, it is wise to agree in advance with the Building Control Body that the proposed approach is acceptable.Further information:

The text of AD L2, including the legal technical requirements and Appendix H, can be viewed on the ODPM website http://www.safety.odpm.gov.uk/bregs/brads.htm.
Those not familiar with the provisions in the Building Regulations applied to building work (eg some building services engineers whose work has previously been outside the bounds of building work covered) would be well advised to look at the Building Regulations 2000 and the amendment.

Frequently asked questions on Part L are dealt with on the website http://projects.bre.co.uk/partlfaq/ where a hyperlink offers a list of all the material ODPM have published in connection with the Part L amendments. Further advice on the requirements and the guidance in the AD can be obtained by Emailing BRE at: mailto:environment@bre.co.uk.

Nitecool is available on the web site http://projects.bre.co.uk/refurb/nitecool/

Photographs:
(Top Right) Glazed stacks at the BRE Environmental Building.
(Top Left) Brise soleil at the Scottish Office, Edinburgh.



RETURN TO HOME PAGE